Difference between revisions of "Static Longitudinal Field Relaxation"
m |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
In the limit where <math>B \gg </math> any random local magnetic fields ('''RLMF'''), this formulation is valid. (At last, a "low-bogosity" case!) However, in modest applied fields (<i>B</i> <math> \sim </math> RLMF) it is subject to the same ''caveats'' as the '''ZF''' case, which see. |
In the limit where <math>B \gg </math> any random local magnetic fields ('''RLMF'''), this formulation is valid. (At last, a "low-bogosity" case!) However, in modest applied fields (<i>B</i> <math> \sim </math> RLMF) it is subject to the same ''caveats'' as the '''ZF''' case, which see. |
||
The "decoupling" effect of LF was observed in the same experiment where ZF "Kubo-Toyabe relaxation" was first observed: |
|||
<center> |
|||
[[Image:MnSi-ZLF.png|300px|inline image (click to see full size)]] |
|||
{| width="80%" |
|||
! align="center" | |
|||
<math>g^{\rm GKT}_{zz}(t)</math> in MnSi at 285 K for LF = 0, 10 and 30 Oe. |
|||
|} |
|||
</center> |
|||
It is slightly ironic that the ZF/LF relaxation by nuclear dipole moments predicted by Kubo and Toyabe was first observed in MnSi at 285 K, since at lower temperatures MnSi exhibits a rich magnetic behavior due to the strong paramagnetic moments of the Mn ions. At room temperature these huge moments fluctuate fast enough to decouple from both the muon and the Mn nuclei, leaving their spins to influence each other directly. |
Latest revision as of 10:24, 17 September 2022
Relaxonomy --> here
When the muon spin polarization <math>\vec{P}</math> is initially in the same direction as the applied magnetic field <math>\vec{B}</math>, we call that the <math>z</math> direction. This is called the longitudinal field (LF) geometry. The relaxation of <math>\vec{P}</math> is then usually described by
where the lower case <math>g</math> is used (instead of the more general <math>G</math>) to designate a static relaxation function, just like in ZF. (Dynamic cases will be treated later.)
In the limit where <math>B \gg </math> any random local magnetic fields (RLMF), this formulation is valid. (At last, a "low-bogosity" case!) However, in modest applied fields (B <math> \sim </math> RLMF) it is subject to the same caveats as the ZF case, which see.
The "decoupling" effect of LF was observed in the same experiment where ZF "Kubo-Toyabe relaxation" was first observed:
<math>g^{\rm GKT}_{zz}(t)</math> in MnSi at 285 K for LF = 0, 10 and 30 Oe. |
---|
It is slightly ironic that the ZF/LF relaxation by nuclear dipole moments predicted by Kubo and Toyabe was first observed in MnSi at 285 K, since at lower temperatures MnSi exhibits a rich magnetic behavior due to the strong paramagnetic moments of the Mn ions. At room temperature these huge moments fluctuate fast enough to decouple from both the muon and the Mn nuclei, leaving their spins to influence each other directly.