Difference between revisions of "Stretched Exponentials"
m |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
In between exponential <math>\exp(-\lambda t)</math> and gaussian <math>\exp[-(\sigma t)^2]</math> relaxation (and indeed extending beyond either) is the much-abused empirical "'''''stretched exponential'''''" function, <center><math>\exp[-(\Lambda t)^\beta]</math></center> |
In between exponential <math>\exp(-\lambda t)</math> and gaussian <math>\exp[-(\sigma t)^2]</math> relaxation (and indeed extending beyond either) is the much-abused empirical "'''''stretched exponential'''''" function, <center><math>\exp[-(\Lambda t)^\beta]</math></center> |
||
I don't much care for it. It will ''fit'' a wide variety of ZF-µSR relaxation functions, but what do the results ''mean''? What do they tell us about the physics? There are cases where "root exponential" relaxation functions (<math>\beta = 1/2</math>) suggest a rapidly fluctuating spin glass, but fit results with <math>\beta</math> all the way from 0.25 to 3 have been published without any hint of irony. Please don't resort to this. |
I don't much care for it. It will ''fit'' a wide variety of ZF-µSR relaxation functions, but what do the results ''mean''? What do they tell us about the physics? There are cases where "root exponential" relaxation functions (<math>\beta = 1/2</math>) suggest a rapidly fluctuating spin glass, but fit results with <math>\beta</math> all the way from 0.25 to 3 have been published without any hint of irony. Please don't resort to this. |
||
<center> |
|||
[[Image:StrExp_color.png|400px|inline image (click to see full size)]] |
|||
{| width="80%" |
|||
! align="left" | |
|||
<math>G(t) = \exp[-(\Lambda t)^\beta]</math> for <math>\Lambda = 1</math> and <math>\beta = 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3</math>. Only <math>\beta = 1, 2</math> and sometimes <math>0.5</math> have familiar physical meanings. |
|||
|} |
|||
Latest revision as of 10:28, 17 September 2022
Relaxonomy --> here
In between exponential <math>\exp(-\lambda t)</math> and gaussian <math>\exp[-(\sigma t)^2]</math> relaxation (and indeed extending beyond either) is the much-abused empirical "stretched exponential" function,
I don't much care for it. It will fit a wide variety of ZF-µSR relaxation functions, but what do the results mean? What do they tell us about the physics? There are cases where "root exponential" relaxation functions (<math>\beta = 1/2</math>) suggest a rapidly fluctuating spin glass, but fit results with <math>\beta</math> all the way from 0.25 to 3 have been published without any hint of irony. Please don't resort to this.
|
<math>G(t) = \exp[-(\Lambda t)^\beta]</math> for <math>\Lambda = 1</math> and <math>\beta = 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3</math>. Only <math>\beta = 1, 2</math> and sometimes <math>0.5</math> have familiar physical meanings. |
|---|
