ANSWER: The longest wavelength (ground) state of a particle in a one-dimensional (1D) "box" has and therefore (by de Broglie's hypothesis) momentum . For a "1D box" this large the electron will be nonrelativistic (you can check this), so we can set and thus where is the time for the electron to make a round trip to the other end and back. Thus the electron transfers momentum (by reversing its direction) to one end of the "string" every , generating an average force . Then we just plug in m, kg and J-s to get or . Since each end of the SWNT is being pushed "out" by this force, it is the same as the tension in the SWNT.1
ANSWER: The arguments developed for the time-averaged force exerted on one wall of a cubical 3D container apply equally well for the force acting on the boundary of a 1D "box" - namely, for a single particle bouncing back and forth, , where is the length of the "box". In this case there is only one direction of motion (degree of freedom) so we can drop the subscript on . The EQUIPARTITION THEOREM says that the thermal average of the kinetic energy associated with this translational degree of freedom is , giving . If we substitute this back into the formula for we get . For particles all doing this at the same time, we just multiply by , giving or (ignoring the fact that the actual force at any instant fluctuates minutely about the average force ) . This is the 1D equivalent of the IDEAL GAS LAW. Note that the only difference between this derivation and the one for a 3D box is that here we didn't have to introduce the notion of pressure as the force per unit area. This is simpler!
ANSWER: Again the 1D case is much simpler than the 3D case because we don't have to worry about composing out of (or out of , and ). There is just one direction, just one velocity component, one momentum component and one wavelength to worry about making commensurate with the length of the "box". Thus the requirement that an integer half-wavelengths fit evenly into gives and so or . Thus the possible values of the speed are evenly spaced every and the distribution of speeds varies only as the Boltzmann factor . This gives immediately where is a normalization constant that does not depend on . You get full credit for this result, but here's how to get : Let where is treated as a constant. Now, or so and we have You can look up the definite integral; its value is , giving .
ANSWER: As stated in the textbook, the most probable speed for an ideal gas molecule in 3D is (i.e. when ). For the 1D gas, however, is missing that extra factor of that forces its value to zero at , so the resultant speed distribution has its maximum at : .