Difference between revisions of "Static Longitudinal Field Relaxation"

From WeKey
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "Relaxonomy --> here ---- When the muon spin polarization <math>\vec{P}</math> is initially in the same direction as the applied magnetic field <math>\vec{B}</math>, we ca...")
 
m
Line 2: Line 2:
----
----


When the muon spin polarization <math>\vec{P}</math> is initially in the same direction as the applied magnetic field <math>\vec{B}</math>, we call that the <math>z</math> direction. This is called the '''''longitudinal field''''' ('''LF''') geometry. The relaxation of <math>\vec{P}</math> is then described by
When the muon spin polarization <math>\vec{P}</math> is initially in the same direction as the applied magnetic field <math>\vec{B}</math>, we call that the <math>z</math> direction. This is called the '''''longitudinal field''''' ('''LF''') geometry. The relaxation of <math>\vec{P}</math> is then usually described by


<center><math> g_{zz}(t) \; \equiv \; \langle P_z(0) \, P_z(t) \rangle </math></center>
<center><math> g_{zz}(t) \; \equiv \; \langle P_z(0) \, P_z(t) \rangle </math></center>


where the lower case <math>g</math> is used (instead of the more general <math>G</math>)
where the lower case <math>g</math> is used (instead of the more general <math>G</math>)
to designate a '''''static''''' relaxation function. ('''''Dynamic''''' cases will be treated later.)
to designate a '''''static''''' relaxation function, just like in '''ZF'''. ('''''Dynamic''''' cases will be treated later.)


just like in '''ZF'''. In the limit where <math>B</math> >> any random local magnetic fields ('''RLMF'''), this formulation is valid. (At last, a "low-bogosity" case!) However, in modest applied fields (<i>B</i> <math> \sim </math> RLMF) it is subject to the same ''caveats'' as the '''ZF''' case, which see.
In the limit where <math>B \gg </math> any random local magnetic fields ('''RLMF'''), this formulation is valid. (At last, a "low-bogosity" case!) However, in modest applied fields (<i>B</i> <math> \sim </math> RLMF) it is subject to the same ''caveats'' as the '''ZF''' case, which see.

Revision as of 15:10, 15 September 2022

Relaxonomy --> here


When the muon spin polarization [math]\displaystyle{ \vec{P} }[/math] is initially in the same direction as the applied magnetic field [math]\displaystyle{ \vec{B} }[/math], we call that the [math]\displaystyle{ z }[/math] direction. This is called the longitudinal field (LF) geometry. The relaxation of [math]\displaystyle{ \vec{P} }[/math] is then usually described by

[math]\displaystyle{ g_{zz}(t) \; \equiv \; \langle P_z(0) \, P_z(t) \rangle }[/math]

where the lower case [math]\displaystyle{ g }[/math] is used (instead of the more general [math]\displaystyle{ G }[/math]) to designate a static relaxation function, just like in ZF. (Dynamic cases will be treated later.)

In the limit where [math]\displaystyle{ B \gg }[/math] any random local magnetic fields (RLMF), this formulation is valid. (At last, a "low-bogosity" case!) However, in modest applied fields (B [math]\displaystyle{ \sim }[/math] RLMF) it is subject to the same caveats as the ZF case, which see.