BELIEVE   ME   NOT!    -     A   SKEPTIC's   GUIDE  

... times.1
Since our dollar will be worth less a year from now, we should really call it deflation!
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
... change:2
The error introduced by this approximation is not very serious.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
... time.3
Banks, insurance companies, trade unions, and governments all pretend that they don't assume this, but they would all go bankrupt if they didn't assume it.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
... time.4
A politician trying to obfuscate the issue might say, "The rate of decrease is decreasing."
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
... combination5
"Linear combination" means we multiply each term by a simple constant and add them up.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
... derivatives,6
The CHAIN RULE for derivatives says that if  z  is an explicit function of  y,  z(y),  and  y  is an explicit function of  x,  y(x),  then  z  is an implicit function of  x  and its derivative with respect to  x  is given by

\begin{displaymath}{dz \over dx} = {dz \over dy} \cdot {dy \over dx}. \end{displaymath}

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
... us.7
This is exactly what a "scientific" hand calculator does when you push the function key whose name will be revealed momentarily.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
... either8
Now you know which key it is on a calculator.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
... shown9
Watch for this phrase! Whenever someone says "It can easily be shown...," they mean, "This is possible to prove, but I haven't got time; besides, I might want to assign it as homework."
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Jess H. Brewer
1998-08-04