"Laws" of Algebra

by  Jess H. Brewer


In Algebra we learn to "solve" equations. What does that mean? Usually it means that we are to take a (relatively) complicated equation that has the "unknown" (often but not always called "$ x$") scattered all over the place and turn it into a (relatively) simple equation with $ x$ on the left-hand side by itself and a bunch of other symbols (not including $ x$) on the right-hand side of the "=" sign. Obviously this particular format is "just" a convention. But the idea is independent of the representation: we want to "solve" for the "unknown" quantity, in this case $ x$.

Operations and Notation

Most algebra involves only a few simple operations:


Laws

There are a few basic rules we use to "solve" problems in Algebra; these are called "laws" by Mathematicians who want to emphasize that you are not to question their content or representation.

These "laws" may seem pretty trivial (especially the first two) but they define the rules of Algebra whereby we learn to manipulate the form of equations and "solve" Algebra "problems." We quickly learn equivalent shortcuts like "moving a factor from the bottom of the left-hand-side [often abbreviated LHS] to the top of the right-hand side [RHS]:"

$\displaystyle {x - a \over b} = c + d \quad \Rightarrow \quad x - a = b(c+d)$ (10)

and so on; but each of these is just a well-justified concatenation of several of the fundamental steps.

You may ask, "Why go to so much trouble to express the obvious in such formal terms?" Well, as usual the obvious is not necessarily the truth. While the real, imaginary and complex numbers may all obey these simple rules, there are perfectly legitimate and useful fields of "things" (usually some sort of operators) that do not obey all these rules, as we may see later. It is generally a good idea to know your own assumptions; we haven't the time to keep reexamining them constantly, so we try to state them as plainly as we can and keep them around for reference "just in case . . . . "

"I'm thinking of a number, and its name is '$ x$' . . . " So if

$\displaystyle a x^2 + b x + c = 0,$ (11)

what is $ x$? Well, we can only say, "It depends." Namely, it depends on the values of $ a, b$ and $ c$, whatever they are. Let's suppose the dimensions of all these "parameters" are mutually consistent3 so that the equation makes sense. Then "it can be shown" (a classic phrase if there ever was one -- if you want to see the details, check out this link) that the "answer" is generally4

$\displaystyle x = {-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac} \over 2a} .$ (12)

This formula (and the preceding equation that defines what we mean by $ a, b$ and $ c$) is known as the Quadratic Theorem, so called because it offers "the answer" to any quadratic equation (i.e. one containing powers of $ x$ up to and including $ x^2$). The power of such a general solution is prodigious.

Want to work out a few examples? Click "Next Quadratic Equation" to get your question, then enter your answer in the textbox and click "GO":      
       

This also suggests an interesting new way of looking at the relationship between $ x$ and the parameters $ a, b$ and $ c$ that determine its value(s). Having $ x$ all by itself on one side of the equation and no $ x$'s anywhere on the other side is what we call a "solution" in Algebra.

Let's make a simpler version of this sort of equation: "I'm thinking of a number, and its name is 'y' . . . " So if y = f(x), what is y? The answer is again, "It depends!" [In this case, upon the value of x and the detailed form of the function f(x).] Time to move on into CALCULUS!



Jess H. Brewer 2020-08-15