What happens when coherent light comes through more than two slits,
all equally spaced a distance apart, in a line parallel to the
incoming wave fronts? The same criterion (46)
still holds for completely *con*structive interference
(what we will now refer to as the PRINCIPAL MAXIMA)
but (47) is no longer a reliable criterion
for *de*structive interference: each successive slit's
contribution cancels out that of the adjacent slit,
but if there are an *odd number of slits*, there is still
one left over and the combined amplitude is not zero.

Does this mean there are *no* angles where the intensity goes to zero?
Not at all; but it is not quite so simple to locate them.
One way of making this calculation easier to visualize
(albeit in a rather abstract way) is with the geometrical
aid of PHASORS:

There is not much advantage to this geometrical description
for a *single* wave
(except perhaps that it engages the right hemisphere of the brain
a little more than the algebraic expression)
but when one goes to "add together" two or more waves
with *different phases*, it helps a lot!

where

That is, the combined amplitude can be obtained by adding the phasors "tip-to-tail" like ordinary vectors. Like the original components, the whole thing continues to precess in the complex plane at the common frequency .

We are now ready to use PHASORS to find the amplitude of an arbitrary number of waves of arbitrary amplitudes and phases but a common frequency and wavelength interfering at a given position. This is illustrated in Fig. 14.17 for 5 phasors.

Instead, we concentrate on simple combinations of waves of equal amplitude with well defined phase differences, such as those produced by a regular array of parallel slits with an equal spacing between adjacent slits. Figure 14.18 shows an example using 6 identical slits with a spacing . The angular width of the interference pattern from such widely spaced slits is quite narrow, only 10 mrad ( radians) between principal maxima where all 6 rays are in phase. In between the principal maxima there are 5 minima and 4 secondary maxima; this can be generalized:

It may be conceptually helpful to show the geometrical explanation of the 6-slit interference pattern in Fig. 14.18 in terms of phasor diagrams, but clearly the smooth curve shown there is not the result of an infinte number of geometrical constructions. It comes from an algebraic formula that we can derive for an arbitrary angle and a corresponding phase difference between rays from adjacent slits. The formula itself is obtained by analysis of a geometrical construction like that illustrated in Fig. 14.19 for 7 slits, each of which contributes a wave of amplitude , with a phase difference of between adjacent slits.

After adding all 7 equal-length phasors in Fig. 14.19
"tip-to-tail",
we can draw a vector from the starting point to the tip of
the final phasor. This vector has a length (the net amplitude)
and makes a chord of the circumscribed circle, intercepting an angle

as can be seen from the blowup in Fig. 14.20; this can be combined with the analogous

to give the net amplitude

From Eq. (50) we know that , and in general , so

where

Although the drawing shows phasors, this result is valid for an arbitrary number of equally spaced and evenly illuminated slits.