Next: Time-of-flight spectra
Up: The
Previous: Direct stop contribution at
Table 8.13:
The fusion yields
Ydt per stopped in the US (top), MOD
(middle) and TOF (bottom) measurements, with corrections due to the
energy and the time cuts
,
, the effects of dd proton
, and of N2 contamination
. The Si solid angles from
Table 6.5 and the stopping fraction of 0.299(15) are
used. Bold-faced values are chosen as our final results.
US |
ID |
E cut |
Si yield |
|
|
|
|
Ydt |
(DS) |
(ct) |
(103 ch) |
(10-5/ GMU) |
|
(%/) |
|
|
(10-3/
stop) |
3 T |
II-2 |
2.7; 3.7 |
5.77(9) |
1.0 |
1.7(9) |
.890 |
.966(34) |
9.45(72) |
(20) |
|
3.1; 3.7 |
5.53(8) |
.980(3) |
n/a |
|
|
9.24(70) |
6 T |
II-3 |
2.0; 3.7 |
16.58(14) |
1.0 |
1.8(9) |
.886 |
.966(34) |
27.3(20) |
(20) |
|
2.7; 3.7 |
16.28(48) |
.975(5) |
|
|
|
27.5(22) |
14 T |
II-4 |
1.0; 3.7 |
42.73(24) |
.970(4) |
2.1(10) |
.884 |
.966(34) |
72.6(54) |
(20) |
|
2.0; 3.7 |
39.80(22) |
.920(10) |
|
|
|
71.3(54) |
14 T |
II-7 |
1.0; 3.7 |
43.43(19) |
.970(4) |
2.1(10) |
.884 |
.976(24) |
73.8(55) |
(0) |
|
2.0; 3.7 |
40.98(17) |
.920(10) |
|
|
|
73.4(55) |
14 T |
II-13 |
1.0; 3.7 |
45.80(35) |
.970(4) |
2.1(10) |
.884 |
1.0 |
75.2(50) |
(0) |
.2% |
2.0; 3.7 |
43.00(20) |
.920(10) |
|
|
|
74.4(50) |
20 T |
II-16 |
1.0; 3.7 |
44.90(16) |
.914(16) |
2.3(10) |
.884 |
1.0 |
78.2(53) |
(0) |
.05% |
2.0; 3.7 |
40.63(14) |
.828(29) |
|
|
|
78.2(58) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US |
ID |
E cut |
Si yield |
|
|
|
|
Ydt |
(T cut) |
(ct) |
(103 ch) |
(10-5/ GMU) |
|
(%/ |
|
|
(10-3/
stop) |
0 T |
II-1 |
1; 3.7 |
25.35(20) |
.954(18) |
2.6(10) |
1.0 |
.966(34) |
36.6(28) |
(.3; 6) |
|
2; 3.7 |
24.04(17) |
.903(35) |
|
|
|
36.7(31) |
3 T |
II-2 |
1; 3.7 |
15.38(88) |
.954(18) |
2.6(10) |
1.0 |
.966(34) |
22.5(22) |
(.5; 6) |
|
2; 3.7 |
14.90(50) |
.903(35) |
|
|
|
23.0(21) |
6 T |
II-3 |
1; 3.7 |
8.82(90) |
.954(18) |
2.6(10) |
.988 |
.966(34) |
13.1(22) |
(.6; 6) |
|
2; 3.7 |
8.88(52) |
.903(35) |
|
|
|
13.9(21) |
14 T |
II-4 |
1; 3.7 |
1.93(11) |
.954(18) |
2.6(10) |
.998 |
.966(34) |
2.85(27) |
(.8; 6) |
|
2; 3.7 |
1.84(7) |
.903(35) |
|
|
|
2.87(26) |
14 T |
II-11 |
1; 3.7 |
2.15(12) |
.954(18) |
2.6(10) |
.998 |
.976(24) |
3.14(29) |
(.8; 6) |
|
2; 3.7 |
1.86(7) |
.903(35) |
|
|
|
2.87(25) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DS |
ID |
E cut |
Si yield |
|
|
|
|
Final Yield |
(ct) |
|
(103 ch) |
(10-6/ GMU) |
|
(%/ |
|
|
(10-4/
stop) |
3 T |
II-9 |
3.51(25)
|
.969 |
.976(24) |
5.04(50) |
(.1%) |
|
(see Table 8.7) |
|
|
|
6 T |
II-10 |
2.0; 3.7 |
8.55(60) |
1.0 |
2.3(9) |
.962 |
.976(24) |
12.4(12) |
(.1%) |
|
2.7; 3.7 |
8.75(51) |
.975(4) |
|
|
|
13.0(12) |
20 T |
II-11 |
1.0; 3.7 |
20.7(11) |
.954(18) |
2.6(10) |
.948 |
.976(24) |
31.9(29) |
(.1%) |
|
2.0; 3.7 |
18.24(69) |
.903(35) |
|
|
|
29.7(26) |
3 T |
II-14 |
3.05(24)
|
.971 |
1.0 |
4.27(54) |
(.2%) |
|
(see Table 8.8) |
|
|
|
23 T |
II-15 |
1.0;3.7 |
23.16(73) |
.936(29) |
2.8(10) |
.948 |
1.0 |
34.6(27) |
(.2% ) |
|
2.0; 3.7 |
21.08(52) |
.876(52) |
|
|
|
33.7(31) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 8.13 summarizes our results for the yield
measurements with the corrections discussed in this section and
others. Those include the energy cut efficiency
,
ddproton contribution
,
the time cut efficiency
and nitrogen contamination effects
.
The dt fusion
yield Ydt is normalized to stopped muons using the stopping fraction
0.299(15) and the target thickness dependent Si solid angle
(Table 6.5, p. ). That is,
where YSi is the
yield in the Si detector per GMU (averaged
over Si1 and Si2), SH is the stopping fraction,
is Si
solid angle per detector, and
are the various corrections such
as the cut efficiencies and N2 contamination. The final uncertainties
quoted in the table include quadratically added errors for these
corrections. The results with different energy cuts are mostly consistent
with each other. In order to avoid the
occasional presence of low energy background, bold-faced values with
narrower energy cuts (when more
than one is available) are chosen as our final results.
Figure 8.14 plots our final yield results for the US,
MOD, and TOF measurements. The comparison of the data taken with different
conditions, e.g. with different ct, requires some caution. For a
quantitative understanding, the comparison with Monte Carlo calculations is
essential, and will be dealt with in the sections that follow.
Figure 8.14:
Fusion yield per stopped muon for the US
(top), MOD (middle), and TOF (bottom) measurements. The error bars
include the absolute normalization error.
|
Next: Time-of-flight spectra
Up: The
Previous: Direct stop contribution at